Let’s enter @brevis_zk V2 together: A ZK coprocessor that lets devs trustlessly read, compute, and prove insights from the entire history of supported blockchains. Think of it as “Google BigQuery” for crypto, except it’s verified with zero-knowledge proofs instead of vibes. So how does it actually work? ➤ Data Access – Devs specify what historical data they want (block headers, transactions, events, etc). ➤ Computation – Brevis runs your logic via an SDK that abstracts all the painful ZK stuff. ➤ Proof + Verify – Brevis generates a ZK proof off-chain, and smart contracts verify it on-chain, trustlessly. Example: A DEX could use Brevis to prove someone traded $3M volume across 350 swaps. All verified directly on-chain, no Dune dashboards or SQL hacks needed. No ZK background? No problem. Brevis’s SDK is built on gnark (by Linea/Consensys), but wrapped in dev-friendly abstractions. So what’s next? ➣ 10x performance boost cooking in dev ➣ More supported data types ➣ Cross-chain expansion ➣ coChain on EigenLayer to slash ZK costs even more In short, Brevis just turned “on-chain data” from something you look at into something you can actually compute on and that’s not a small upgrade.
Brevis gave ZK Coprocessors a brain transplant Forget the “pure-ZK” struggle where everything’s slow, costly, and allergic to scale. @brevis_zk dropped Brevis coChain, a “propose-challenge” model that merges Proof-of-Stake + Zero Knowledge = cheaper, faster, and actually usable data coprocessing. Here’s the decode for non-nerds ⇓ Old model (Pure-ZK): Every result = ZK proof. Secure? Yes. Scalable? Not really. Expensive to compute, high latency, and can’t even prove simple stuff like who didn’t trade. New model (coChain): Validators “propose” results via PoS consensus, no proof needed, no upfront. If someone spots a lie, they can throw down a ZK challenge, and bad validators get slashed. If no one challenges? The result stands. Think of Brevis like this: Pure-ZK = absolute truth, but slow and pricey. CoChain = optimistic truth, but with real-time fraud protection and PoS enforcement.
2,8 mil
30
El contenido de esta página lo proporcionan terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es el autor de los artículos citados y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo vinculado para obtener más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. El holding de activos digitales, incluyendo stablecoins y NFT, implican un alto grado de riesgo y pueden fluctuar en gran medida. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti a la luz de tu situación financiera.