Let’s enter @brevis_zk V2 together: A ZK coprocessor that lets devs trustlessly read, compute, and prove insights from the entire history of supported blockchains. Think of it as “Google BigQuery” for crypto, except it’s verified with zero-knowledge proofs instead of vibes. So how does it actually work? ➀ Data Access – Devs specify what historical data they want (block headers, transactions, events, etc). ➀ Computation – Brevis runs your logic via an SDK that abstracts all the painful ZK stuff. ➀ Proof + Verify – Brevis generates a ZK proof off-chain, and smart contracts verify it on-chain, trustlessly. Example: A DEX could use Brevis to prove someone traded $3M volume across 350 swaps. All verified directly on-chain, no Dune dashboards or SQL hacks needed. No ZK background? No problem. Brevis’s SDK is built on gnark (by Linea/Consensys), but wrapped in dev-friendly abstractions. So what’s next? ➣ 10x performance boost cooking in dev ➣ More supported data types ➣ Cross-chain expansion ➣ coChain on EigenLayer to slash ZK costs even more In short, Brevis just turned “on-chain data” from something you look at into something you can actually compute on and that’s not a small upgrade.
Brevis gave ZK Coprocessors a brain transplant Forget the “pure-ZK” struggle where everything’s slow, costly, and allergic to scale. @brevis_zk dropped Brevis coChain, a “propose-challenge” model that merges Proof-of-Stake + Zero Knowledge = cheaper, faster, and actually usable data coprocessing. Here’s the decode for non-nerds ⇓ Old model (Pure-ZK): Every result = ZK proof. Secure? Yes. Scalable? Not really. Expensive to compute, high latency, and can’t even prove simple stuff like who didn’t trade. New model (coChain): Validators “propose” results via PoS consensus, no proof needed, no upfront. If someone spots a lie, they can throw down a ZK challenge, and bad validators get slashed. If no one challenges? The result stands. Think of Brevis like this: Pure-ZK = absolute truth, but slow and pricey. CoChain = optimistic truth, but with real-time fraud protection and PoS enforcement.
2,79 k
30
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX n’est pas l’auteur du ou des articles citĂ©s et ne revendique aucun droit d’auteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni Ă  titre d’information uniquement et ne reprĂ©sente pas les opinions d’OKX. Il ne s’agit pas d’une approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas ĂȘtre considĂ©rĂ© comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation d’achat ou de vente d’actifs numĂ©riques. Dans la mesure oĂč l’IA gĂ©nĂ©rative est utilisĂ©e pour fournir des rĂ©sumĂ©s ou d’autres informations, ce contenu gĂ©nĂ©rĂ© par IA peut ĂȘtre inexact ou incohĂ©rent. Veuillez lire l’article associĂ© pour obtenir davantage de dĂ©tails et d’informations. OKX n’est pas responsable du contenu hĂ©bergĂ© sur des sites tiers. La dĂ©tention d’actifs numĂ©riques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque Ă©levĂ© et leur valeur peut considĂ©rablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financiĂšre pour dĂ©terminer si le trading ou la dĂ©tention d’actifs numĂ©riques vous convient.