Letâs enter @brevis_zk V2 together:
A ZK coprocessor that lets devs trustlessly read, compute, and prove insights from the entire history of supported blockchains.
Think of it as âGoogle BigQueryâ for crypto, except itâs verified with zero-knowledge proofs instead of vibes.
So how does it actually work?
†Data Access â Devs specify what historical data they want (block headers, transactions, events, etc).
†Computation â Brevis runs your logic via an SDK that abstracts all the painful ZK stuff.
†Proof + Verify â Brevis generates a ZK proof off-chain, and smart contracts verify it on-chain, trustlessly.
Example:
A DEX could use Brevis to prove someone traded $3M volume across 350 swaps. All verified directly on-chain, no Dune dashboards or SQL hacks needed.
No ZK background? No problem.
Brevisâs SDK is built on gnark (by Linea/Consensys), but wrapped in dev-friendly abstractions.
So whatâs next?
⣠10x performance boost cooking in dev
⣠More supported data types
⣠Cross-chain expansion
⣠coChain on EigenLayer to slash ZK costs even more
In short, Brevis just turned âon-chain dataâ from something you look at into something you can actually compute on and thatâs not a small upgrade.

Brevis gave ZK Coprocessors a brain transplant
Forget the âpure-ZKâ struggle where everythingâs slow, costly, and allergic to scale.
@brevis_zk dropped Brevis coChain, a âpropose-challengeâ model that merges Proof-of-Stake + Zero Knowledge = cheaper, faster, and actually usable data coprocessing.
Hereâs the decode for non-nerds â
Old model (Pure-ZK):
Every result = ZK proof. Secure? Yes. Scalable? Not really.
Expensive to compute, high latency, and canât even prove simple stuff like who didnât trade.
New model (coChain):
Validators âproposeâ results via PoS consensus, no proof needed, no upfront.
If someone spots a lie, they can throw down a ZK challenge, and bad validators get slashed.
If no one challenges? The result stands.
Think of Brevis like this:
Pure-ZK = absolute truth, but slow and pricey.
CoChain = optimistic truth, but with real-time fraud protection and PoS enforcement.

2,79Â k
30
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX nâest pas lâauteur du ou des articles citĂ©s et ne revendique aucun droit dâauteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni Ă titre dâinformation uniquement et ne reprĂ©sente pas les opinions dâOKX. Il ne sâagit pas dâune approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas ĂȘtre considĂ©rĂ© comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation dâachat ou de vente dâactifs numĂ©riques. Dans la mesure oĂč lâIA gĂ©nĂ©rative est utilisĂ©e pour fournir des rĂ©sumĂ©s ou dâautres informations, ce contenu gĂ©nĂ©rĂ© par IA peut ĂȘtre inexact ou incohĂ©rent. Veuillez lire lâarticle associĂ© pour obtenir davantage de dĂ©tails et dâinformations. OKX nâest pas responsable du contenu hĂ©bergĂ© sur des sites tiers. La dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque Ă©levĂ© et leur valeur peut considĂ©rablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financiĂšre pour dĂ©terminer si le trading ou la dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques vous convient.